1/17/2024 0 Comments Graphql vs rest performance![]() ![]() The Method: There are various methods that you can use to call a REST API, the most common ones being POST and GET.The Headers: Headers refer to the Authentication Mode and the Content Types.REST APIs allow you to search for some items, and then the results will be returned from the service you requested from. REST APIs provide a flexible, lightweight way of integrating applications. Its declarative nature allows you to get the best out of it. This predictable data structure makes it highly efficient and readable. GraphQL also allows the user to specify the exact type of data to be received from the server. GraphQL can also allow the users to request data from various resources using a single request.Īs opposed to making multiple requests to fetch data, you can use GraphQL to make ad-hoc queries to a single endpoint and access all the necessary data. This ensures clear relationships between queries and improves the connectivity between objects. Edges between these nodes are used to represent the connection between the nodes of a graph. Nodes defined under the GraphQL Schema System are used to depict objects. It enables the client to make HTTP requests and get responses.Īs the name suggests, any set of information in GraphQL is seen in the context of a graph. GraphQL is a Query Language that can be used to work with APIs. Main Differences between GraphQL vs REST.This blog highlights the key differences between GraphQL and REST API to help you make an educated decision regarding which one suits your business requirements best. REST APIs define a set of constraints on how the architecture of a distributed system should behave. REST API is defined as a Software Architectural Style built to guide the development and design of the architecture for the World Wide Web. Main Differences between GraphQL and REST.Why was GraphQL Developed when REST was there?.Simplify your REST API ETL with Hevo’s No-code Data Pipeline.However, we are confident this is a step in the right direction, and are excited to be working with the community in order to make this transition as smooth and performant as possible. We are moving forward with this tradeoff for the reasons outlined in our blogpost here. There will be examples outside of this one where sometimes the count of calls required to fetch the same set of content will increase from the V1 to V2 API. While we cannot promise this will be faster than V1, hopefully this will address: Even with maximal parallelism, the overhead of multiple REST v2 requests is so big that fetching the pages takes three times as long as the REST v1 implementation. Once the above endpoints are released, the count of required calls from the V2 API will drop from 6 to 2. (there will also be Get content properties for for other content types).Get content properties for pages → will return all content properties that correspond to the page type, and will include an array type page-id filter so response can be narrowed down to a set of pages.Get all ancestors of page → given a page ID, will return a list of that page’s ancestors.We are working on a few new endpoints that will help out here. For each page, you will need to fetch that page’s parent & the parent’s parent, and then fetch the corresponding content properties for each of those pages in a separate call. I see that to achieve what you have outlined above with the V2 API, you need to make 6x the amount of calls with V2 vs. This is exactly the kind of feedback we are looking for, feedback that helps ensure we are working towards the best possible experience for our consumers. Thank you for the detailed feedback around the Confluence REST API v2. The following box plot shows the results of the four tests (REST v1, REST v2 with sequential requests, REST v2 with parallel requests, and GraphQL): wiki/api/v2/pages//properties?key=property REST v1: /wiki/rest/api/content/?expand=, For REST v2, I tested two different implementations-one that fetches ancestors and content properties sequentially for a particular page and one that parallelizes requests as much as possible. For REST v1, I made ten parallel requests with two expansions and for GraphQL, I used the pages field to fetch all pages in a single request. I fetched ten pages, their ancestors (two for each page), and a content property for each page. Unfortunately, both new APIs are significantly slower than REST v1 for the tested use case. The app uses a lot of expansions, and since they are not supported anymore in the new API, I wanted to find out which of the new alternatives (REST v2 or GraphQL) performs better. In this post, I want to share the results of some performance tests that I ran. I’m currently porting an app to the new REST v2 and GraphQL APIs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |